[nzlug] Plone

[Steve Holdoway]

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:47:19 +1300
"Greg Fawcett" <greg at vig.co.nz> wrote:
[snip]
> For an independent measure of the quality of each system, go to
> http://cve.mitre.org/cve/cve.html and use their names as keywords. Joomla
> gets 183, Mambo 159, Wordpress 126, and Plone....4. And only one of those
> affected the current version (Plone 3).
> 
> I host Plone on my own server, so I can't comment on NZ hosts - let me know
> if you are interested in a quote for hosting it.
Although I can't get my head around their constant striving for the next version to be released, I think drupal is a major ommission from your list. And with a score of 102, it beats the other php submissions quite comfortably. I do, however, think that this 'quality' measure also has an indication of the relative popularity of the product well mixed in, and that plone almost adds a 'security by obscurity' take on the whole CMS thingy.

My $0.02,

Steve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.linux.net.nz/pipermail/nzlug/attachments/20080303/4dfc00b9/attachment.pgp