[nzlug] Broadband bandwidth drop: WTF?
Nevyn
nevynh at gmail.com
Mon Jan 21 21:50:24 NZDT 2008
On Jan 21, 2008 9:13 PM, Mark Foster <blakjak at blakjak.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Robin Sheat wrote:
>
> > On Monday 21 January 2008 20:05:03 Cliff Pratt wrote:
> >> I think that the 2Mbps is a *maximum* that you can get under ideal
> >> conditions (eg distance from the exchange, quality of line come into
> >> it). Most people get less than that - many a lot less than that.
> > The maximum for an ADSL line is something like 8Mb (I think). An average line
> > should be able to reach 2Mb quite happily. For example, I'm currently
> > connected at 7616 Kbps, although the actual rate I get depends on things like
> > the time of day (as apparently Telecom is quite bad about over-committing
> > their DSLAMs).
>
>
> 7616 or therabouts is the theoretical limit that I seem to recall for
> ADSL1.
>
> > However, I think the real issue behind the speeds is a confusion over bits and
> > bytes, as others have mentioned. The speeds mentioned sound about right for
> > that to be the case (i.e. 2Mbit is 2,000kbit, and 2,000/8 is 250kB, which is
> > exactly what was described)
>
> Yep. Trap for new players that one.
The computer industry is notorious for doing things like this. I.e.
the difference between b and B when talking about units, the
difference between 1000 and 1024 for hard drives, the claims about
speed of whatever which gets strangled by the speed of the pci bus
etc.
More information about the NZLUG
mailing list