[nzlug] CentOS and the "joys" of rpm based systems
Daniel Lawson
daniel at meta.net.nz
Sun Jan 20 19:34:30 NZDT 2008
> works, but I really wouldn't bother. A package manager is a package manager after all, and I've had just as many issues with apt as with yum ( well, except for that python overflow thing, but that was a long time ago ) over the years. I think you'll find CentOS 5.1 has been available since before christmas if that's of any use to you.
>
I've always found yum's package resolution tediously slow. There is also
some benefit to having the same abstraction layer around package
management on all your machines, and there are annoying differences in
commands. While the "install" method of both is the same, searching for
packages is different:
apt-cache search on debian based systems (note: i can't recall if this
is exported via apt-rpm at all!) provides similar output to yum list
yum search provides rather different output, and is typically useless.
While it's not "hard" to learn two different toolsets, when you are
dealing with somewhere between one and two hundred debian machines and
you have 5 redhat/centos machines to look after, the overhead of
tracking, learning, and *passing on to others* the extra commandsets
gets pretty high very quickly.
More information about the NZLUG
mailing list