[nzlug] Virtualization + ethernet/ping issues.

Steve Holdoway steve at greengecko.co.nz
Wed Feb 13 13:13:27 NZDT 2008


On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:05:45 +1300
"Michael Hutchinson" <mhutchinson at manux.co.nz> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nzlug-bounces at linux.net.nz [mailto:nzlug-bounces at linux.net.nz]
> On
> > Behalf Of Steve Holdoway
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:19:41 +1300
> > "Michael Hutchinson" <mhutchinson at manux.co.nz> wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Which version of vmware?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers, Rex
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry all for leaving this out of my post. We are using VMWare
> Server
> > > 1.0.3
> > >
> > > I believe there is an update, but are not rushing out to do this as
> the
> > > Virtualized windows servers are required to be live 99.99% of the
> time
> > > (at least, management would like that :)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Mike
> > 
> > Don't forget that scheduled downtime is not included in that total! I
> had
> > routing issues ( debian clients losing their default routes ) when
> running
> > on a pre-1.0.4 vmware server installation. The host is 6.10 ubuntu -
> all
> > 64 bit.
> > 
> > Upgrade was harmless in my case - 2 debian servers and win 2003 r2
> server
> > clients.
> > 
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> Something in common: our bare metal host is 64bit (AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2
> Dual Core Processor 5600+), however it runs Windows 2003 server 32bit
> edition, and the guest O/S's are 32bit. The decision for 32bit was made
> before I was working here.
> 
> I investigated the default route issue, and I don't think we are losing
> that on the server in question, as it monitors nearly 100 sites, and
> several sites on the same IP ranges as the one affected - no other sites
> are reported down. Where they should be if our default route is being
> lost. Keeping in mind the affected site is up and working fine, and
> responds to pings from other servers.
> 
> It is possible to schedule an upgrade. It would be nice to be able to
> prove that VMWARE is the issue first, however. There must be some
> technical network tests I can perform to shed some more light on the
> issue. Knowing that tcpdump will report that the returning packets are
> fine, I'm left with stracing the ping command, which I'm off to do right
> now.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NZLUG mailing list NZLUG at linux.net.nz
> http://www.linux.net.nz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nzlug

Sorry, I wasn't clear enough. It was the clients that were losing their default routes. I could ssh to them as long as I was on the same subnet, restore it, then all was then fine again. However, from your comments, I don't think it's relevant to your setup ):

Steve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.linux.net.nz/pipermail/nzlug/attachments/20080213/792c2483/attachment.pgp


More information about the NZLUG mailing list