[nzlug] All email clients suck, no exceptions
ronw at paradise.net.nz
ronw at paradise.net.nz
Fri Jul 27 12:01:49 NZST 2007
Just my 2 cents worth
I use Evolution on SuSe 10.2 works fine. For spam I use Popfile (Sourceforge)
which I think is the best spam detector out there. Once you have it trained it
hums along nicely. I have it file all spam in a trash folder and every day or so
I check the contents. It only takes a second and then I delete the contents.
I tar up the evolution . folder every few months and store it offline and then
delete the current contents.
Quoting David McNab <david at rebirthing.co.nz>:
> Hi all,
>
> Firstly, this is a gentle warning to those of us in the Ubuntu/Gnome
> user community who are currently putting up with Evolution as their
> main
> email client.
>
> A couple of weeks ago, the junk mail filter in Evolution (by default,
> it
> uses bogomail), totally lost the plot and started junking about 50% of
> my legit emails.
>
> I was oblivious to it, till some people I was talking to on the phone
> asked me 'didn't you get my email?!'.
>
> A search through the junk mail folder revealed what had happened.
> Hundreds of legit messages, including mailing list traffic and critical
> business messages, had ended up among the spam.
>
> One of these days, someone might come up with an email client that
> doesn't totally suck in at least one major area:
>
> - thunderbird - nice client on the whole, good ui and plugins
> catalog, product of venerable Mozilla foundation. Downside: when
> I upgraded my Ubuntu distro and installed a new Tbird version, it
> failed to recognise my existing Tbird mail store and insisted on
> me creating new accounts. When I tried importing my email from
> the old store, it choked
>
> - sylpheed-claws - very slick and fast client. Shame that on sending,
> it claims to have sent the message successfully, but quite often
> the message never gets delivered. On the positive side, it is one
> of the few email clients where the authors show the respect and
> courtesy to offer the ability to export the mail store
>
> - sylpheed - dumbed down version of sylpheed-claws, missing several
> crucial points of functionality
>
> - pine - bearable - but suffers from the inherent problem in all
> console clients - the inability to display attachments inline and
> properly render HTML messages
>
> - mutt - claims to suck less, but its curses user interface and lack
> of
> folder tree display make it (at least for me) agony to use,
> let alone the learning curve. I feel mutt is largely for folks who
> take on mutt configuration as a hobby. Also, great for those who
> still do most of their work on vt100/220 terminals.
>
> - mozilla mail - admittedly I haven't given it much use, but one
> assumes it would be pretty similar to tbird, given the lineage
>
> - evolution - lest I forget - good client, good performance (as long
> as one turns a blind eye to the memory footprint), but the good
> performance only lasts for the first few months, until the message
> store starts getting really big. Then it becomes a dog
>
> Maybe, just maybe, someone will come up with an email client with less
> than 80% of the suck factor of the existing clients
>
> </rant>
>
> Cheers
> David
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________ ____________________
> NZLUG mailing list NZLUG at linux.net.nz
> http://www.linux.net.nz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nzlug
>
-
Ron Wilson
More information about the NZLUG
mailing list