[AuckLUG] internet banking

[Nevyn]

This seems just a tiny bit left field - Would've been nice if someone
had provided a reference i.e. an article where this was being
implied....

On 8/21/07, Mark Foster <blakjak at blakjak.net> wrote:
> Anthony,
>
> Join the NZOSS Mailing list and post something.
>
> http://nzoss.org.nz/nzoss/about
>
> The short version IMHO is that its all very well for the banks to make
> threats like that, but its a big grey line - who determines what is secure
> and what isn't?  And whats a 'reasonable attempt' at securing your system?
>
> Its going to cost them quite a bit to have any cases forensically proven
> one way or the other, I think, and 'innocent until proven guilty' comes
> into play as well.
>
> If it scares a few more people into safing up their home systems, then
> cool.. but honestly.. good luck to them trying to enforce it.
>
> Mark.
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Anthony Winter wrote:
>
> > The banks want to make people who don't install anti-virus and anti-spyware
> > software liable for computer fraud from their bank accounts.
> >
> > Clearly, we don't have these things because we don't need them (?)
> > But how would we convince a bank of that?
> >
> > Has the NZ OSS engaged in any dialogue on this point with the banks?
> >
> > ant
> > --
> > anthony winter
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AuckLUG mailing list
> > AuckLUG at linux.net.nz
> > http://www.linux.net.nz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aucklug
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> AuckLUG mailing list
> AuckLUG at linux.net.nz
> http://www.linux.net.nz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aucklug
>